Peer Review for Sponsored Research

Sponsored research funders, such as NIH and other federal agencies, have well-established peer review processes to help objectively identify and invest in grant applications and contract proposals having the most scientific and technical merit.

Expectations for Peer Reviewers

Initial peer review for most sponsored research is conducted primarily by non-federal researchers with relevant expertise in the subject discipline and no conflicts of interest that would inappropriately influence the peer review process (e.g., financial, professional, employment, personal, or other interests). MIT faculty, researchers, and staff who participate in peer review are reminded that confidentiality, security, and integrity are expected and required.

Questions about Peer Review

If you have questions or concerns about your role and responsibilities as a peer reviewer, need clarification on any of the terms of a peer review agreement, or you have a reasonable basis to believe that the integrity of a peer review process has been compromised, you should contact the applicable funding agency, Designated Federal Officer (DFO) or Scientific Review Officer (SRO) assigned to your review, or the Contracting Officer in charge of the solicitation.

NIH Peer Review

NIH rules, policies, and agreements expressly prohibit NIH reviewers from taking certain actions in connection with their service as an NIH reviewer. For example, unless first authorized by the DFO or other designated NIH official, peer reviewers are prohibited from involving their lab members, students, staff, or anyone else, with any aspect of their NIH peer review service.

Additional expectations and requirements from NIH: